• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Math. Phys. 46, 063504 (2005); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1915293 (22 pages)

MHD α2-dynamo, Squire equation and PT-symmetric interpolation between square well and harmonic oscillator

Uwe Günther1, Frank Stefani1, and Miloslav Znojil2

1Research Center Rossendorf, P.O. Box 510119, D-01314 Dresden, Germany
2Ústav Jaderné Fyziky AV ČR, 250 68 Řež, Czech Republic

View MapView Map

(Received 28 January 2005; accepted 18 March 2005; published online 17 May 2005)

It is shown that the α2-dynamo of magnetohydrodynamics, the hydrodynamic Squire equation as well as an interpolation model of PT-symmetric quantum mechanics are closely related as spectral problems in Krein spaces. For the α2-dynamo and the PT-symmetric model the strong similarities are demonstrated with the help of a 2×2 operator matrix representation, whereas the Squire equation is reinterpreted as a rescaled and Wick-rotated PT-symmetric problem. Based on recent results on the Squire equation the spectrum of the PT-symmetric interpolation model is analyzed in detail and the Herbst limit is described as spectral singularity.

© 2005 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. KREIN SPACE PROPERTIES OF PT -SYMMETRIC QUANTUM MODELS AND OF THE SPHERICALLY SYMMETRIC MHD α2 -DYNAMO
    1. PT -symmetric quantum models
    2. The spherically symmetric MHD α2 -dynamo
    3. Spectral phase transitions
  3. PT -SYMMETRIC INTERPOLATION BETWEEN SQUARE WELL AND HARMONIC OSCILLATOR
    1. Toy model PT -symmetric differential equation
    2. The emergence of mathE ≠ 0 on certain finite subintervals of ν ∊ (−2,0)
  4. THE HERBST LIMIT AND ITS RELATION TO THE SQUIRE EQUATION OF HYDRODYNAMICS
  5. CONLUSIONS

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0022-2488 (print)  
1089-7658 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    C. M. Bender, S. Boettcher, and P. N. Meisinger, J. Math. Phys. 40, 2201 (1999)JMAPAQ000040000005002201000001.

    A. Mostafazadeh, J. Math. Phys. 43, 205 (2002)JMAPAQ000043000001000205000001;, 43, 2814 (2002)JMAPAQ000043000005002814000001.

    A. Mostafazadeh, J. Math. Phys. 43, 3944 (2002)JMAPAQ000043000008003944000001.

    C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and H. F. Jones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 270401 (2002).

    U. Günther and F. Stefani, J. Math. Phys. 44, 3097 (2003)JMAPAQ000044000007003097000001.

    A. Mostafazadeh, J. Math. Phys. 43, 6343 (2002)JMAPAQ000043000012006343000001;, 44, 943(E) (2003)JMAPAQ000044000002000943000001.

    F. Stefani and G. Gerbeth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 184506 (2005).

    C. M. Bender and T. T. Wu, Phys. Rev. 184, 1231 (1969).

    W. D. Heiss and W. H. Steeb, J. Math. Phys. 32, 3003 (1991)JMAPAQ000032000011003003000001.

    F. Stefani and G. Gerbeth, Phys. Rev. E 67, 027302 (2003).

    A. Gailitis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4365 (2000)
    86, 3024 (2001)
    U. Müller and R. Stieglitz, Phys. Fluids 13, 561 (2001)PHFLE6000013000003000561000001;, A. Gailitis et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 973 (2002).


Figures (10)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close